COR160 Essential Academic Writing Skills

Solved
Referencing Styles : Open | Pages : 12
Please Kindly Answer the questions correctly and without any grammatical or punctuation mistakes as I have failed my previous assignment and need to pass this one badly. This Assignment is based on Singapore context and relevant to the assignment’s topic. Note also the following: Spacing (between the lines): 1.5 or double spacing Font style: Arial or Times New Roman preferred Font size: 12 preferred (min 11 and max 13) Cite sources in writing using the proper citation and referencing style. Evaluate information critically from various sources to respond to a task. Synthesise information from various sources in writing in response to a given task. Develop a rhetorical structure of an essay. Apply persuasive argumentative writing strategies in response to a given task. Definition of Section 377A of the Penal Code Issues (moral, ethical, social and etc.) surrounding Section 377A of the Penal Code Arguments for upholding Section 377A of the Penal Code Arguments against upholding Section 377A of the Penal CodeTHE highest court in Singapore has upheld Section 377A of the Penal Code, the law that
criminalises sex between men, rejecting arguments that the provision contravenes the
Constitution.
The three-judge Court of Appeal ruled that Section 377A did not violate the Constitution.
The judgment added: “(The appellants’) remedy lies, if at all, in the legislative sphere.”
The case came after a gay couple, and a man charged with having oral sex with another man
in a public toilet, applied to the courts to void S377A, arguing it was discriminatory. In
November last year, Mr Gary Lim, 44, and Mr Kenneth Chee, 37, who have been partners for
more than 16 years, challenged S377A, arguing, for one thing, that it was discriminatory
since it only targeted men and not women. It therefore breached the couple’s constitutional
right to equality.
There has been much debate in the Singapore Parliament and public sphere with regard to
Section 377A. The two articles provided reflect the debate regarding this issue.
Do you think that Section 377A of the Penal Code should be repealed?
In about 1000 words, develop an essay that applies persuasive argumentative writing
strategies to defend your position on this issue. Other than citing sources to provide
supporting arguments for your position, you MUST anticipate objections and provide
counterarguments to write the paper. Relevant information for you to evaluatand synthesise
would be:
ï‚· Definition of Section 377A of the Penal Code
ï‚· Issues (moral, ethical, social and etc.) surrounding Section 377A of the Penal Code
ï‚· Arguments for upholding Section 377A of the Penal Code
ï‚· Arguments against upholding Section 377A of the Penal Code

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)